Hoping someone can shed some light on this... The q states that the scheme has closed to new entrants and accrual.( So the scheme now has deffereds and pensioners.) The q asks for 4 actions....the examiners report gives 6 possible actions. 4 of these say "may/may not prevent the need for cessation of accrual" Im confused as to why this has even been considered (say half mark each.....thats 2 marks) when the q stated the scheme had already closed to accrual ? Hope that makes sense ? Im concerned about being told an action has occured, being asked what action to take next......and being expected to answer with "the original action was not necesary..." Thanks
April 2011 Hi AAStuck I agree that this wouldn't normally be something that would get you marks. But note the unusual situation - a not particularly strong sponsor, but an extremely strong parent. So, it may not be unreasonable in this situation for the parent to step in. Best wishes Stuart Stuart Underwood ActEd Tutor
