Practice Question 15.15 - determining risk exposure

Discussion in 'SP7' started by B_actuary, Feb 26, 2012.

  1. B_actuary

    B_actuary Member

    I'm confused as to why the total risk earned is the square of the proportion offs the year that the business has been exposed. E.g for business written in Q1, which is 7/8ths through the policy year, why is the total risk earned up to year end 49/64?
     
  2. Katherine Young

    Katherine Young ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi B_actuary,

    Have a look at the explanation attached. I hope it helps.

    Kind regards,

    Katherine.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. B_actuary

    B_actuary Member

    Thanks Katherine. That makes sense now!
     
  4. jensen

    jensen Member

    Dac

    Hi Katherine

    How come the 40% method does not differentiate between net or gross of DAC?

    I would have set 40% of the acqusition costs as DAC.
     
  5. Katherine Young

    Katherine Young ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi Jensen,

    Ordinarily, as you say, an insurer would make an allowance for DAC, and your approach would have been reasonable, had it not been for the wording of the question.

    The question states that the company "calculates UPR to be 40% of WP in the previous twelve months". Hence, no allowance for DAC.

    Kind regards,

    Katherine.
     
  6. Anushree

    Anushree Member

    Hi Katherine,
    I am unable to download the attachment. Could you help me out please?
    Thanks
     
  7. Darren Michaels

    Darren Michaels ActEd Tutor Staff Member

    Hi Anushree

    Here is Katherine's previous attachment. You have probably noticed that the question is now Practice Question 15.15
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Anushree

    Anushree Member

    Thanks Darren. This was helpful.
     

Share This Page