• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

Series X3.3 Solution

J

Justin Pang

Member
Hi,

The solution to Series X3.3 states the following:

"An FRA is an agreement that locks in a specified interest rate based on a specified principal over an agreed future time period.
If an investor has a floating rate debt, on which each interest payment to be made is linked to LIBOR, he or she can use a series of FRAs to lock in a fixed rate at each interest payment date.
In this way a series of FRAs can convert a series of floating rate payments to fixed payments, which is the same as the function of a fixed/floating swap."

I understand that an FRA allows the investor to lock in fixed payments, but how is this converting the floating payments? Surely the investor is still liable to making their floating payments?

Thanks in advance for any explanation.
 
Hi
The rationale is that if an investor has signed up to a series of LIBOR payments over the next (say) 5 years, they can arrange a series of FRAs over each of the next 5 years to "lock in" a fixed rate (say 2% pa). In each year, if the floating rate is <2%, the borrower will indeed still just pay the floating rate on the debt, but will then have to compensate the bank for the difference between 2% and the floating rate. So the net payment (floating interest + FRA derivative payoff) will equal 2%. If the floating rate turns out to be >2% then the investor pays the floating rate but gets a compensation payoff under the FRA for the difference between the floating and 2%, so again the net interest is just 2%.
If the investor had instead arranged a swap where he/she pays floating and received 2%, they would end up in the same situation, so the two are equivalent.
 
Back
Top