• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

solvency questions

G

Gousgounis

Member
Hi,

I have some solvency related questions

1) In Q&A Bank Question 2.12 there is the case of the MCR being proportional to the square root of the premium income. In the answer it says that this is consistent with statistical theory… How is this derived?

2) Is the MCR calculated using accounting years? Isn’t this a limitation?

3) What is the impact of the CER on the solvency margin? Isn’t it treated as an extra liability therefore reducing solvency? For the ECR calculation it can be treated as capital: does this mean that we ignore this extra liability and has no impact on solvency?

Many thanks

Kostas
 
1) The statistical derivation goes back to distribution theory. Whenever we're finding tails of distributions, you remember that we have something like 1.96 times the square root of the number of claims? Well, if you take premiums to be a proxy to claims, then you have your answer. If you're really interested in the detail, try this: http://www.casact.org/library/astin/vol5no2/169.pdf

2) Yes, the MCR looks retrospectively at accounting years (either UY or AY). This is a limitation, but only one of many! No wonder Solvency II will be welcomed with open arms.

3) For the purposes of calculating capital resources the equalisation provision is treated as a technical provision and therefore does reduce the amount by which capital resources exceed the capital resources requirement.

However, the equalisation provision is deducted from the calculation of the ECR, therefore when calculating the excess of capital resources over the ECR the equalisation provision has no net impact as it is a deduction from both capital resources and the ECR.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply.

For (2), does that mean that for calculating the claims amount, we should be using "claims paid + increase in claims outstanding"?
 
No, for calculating the claims amount, you're using claims paid plus outstanding claims (averaged over the relevant number of years).
 
Back
Top