• We are pleased to announce that the winner of our Feedback Prize Draw for the Winter 2024-25 session and winning £150 of gift vouchers is Zhao Liang Tay. Congratulations to Zhao Liang. If you fancy winning £150 worth of gift vouchers (from a major UK store) for the Summer 2025 exam sitting for just a few minutes of your time throughout the session, please see our website at https://www.acted.co.uk/further-info.html?pat=feedback#feedback-prize for more information on how you can make sure your name is included in the draw at the end of the session.
  • Please be advised that the SP1, SP5 and SP7 X1 deadline is the 14th July and not the 17th June as first stated. Please accept out apologies for any confusion caused.

YO.FS and YO*FS - difference?

T

tatos

Member
If we have 2 factors and we want to consider different models for the linear predictor, what is the difference between saying

YO.FS and YO*FS where YO and FS are the 2 factors..?
 
Hi tatos,

YO.FS considers the just interaction between YO and FS whereas
YO*FS considers YO, FS and YO.FS
So, the linear predictor needs to record information about YO, information about FS and information about the interaction between YO and FS.

In general, if YO requires n parameters and FS requires m parameters then
YO*FS will require n*m parameters

John
 
How do you derive the parameterised form for YO*FS*TC ?
 
How do you derive the parameterised form for YO*FS*TC ?

Depends on whether the covariates are factors or variables....

But think of it as multiplying and you won't go far wrong.

So if they are all variables then you would have something like:

\( (\alpha_1 + \beta_1 x)(\alpha_2 + \beta_2 y)(\alpha_3 + \beta_3 z) \)

which you can multiply out and simply the constants to something like:

const + const x + const y + const z + const xy + const xz + const yz + const xyz

If they are all factors then you would have something like:

\( \alpha_i * \beta_j * \gamma_k \)

The easiest way of simplifying this would be to something like:

\( \delta_{ijk} \)
 
Back
Top